Logourl black
From our private database of 13,800+ case briefs...

Old Colony Trust Co. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
423 F.2d 601 (1970)


Facts

The settlor of an inter vivos trust designated himself as one of the trustees during his lifetime and made his son the life beneficiary. Eighty percent of the trust income was payable to his son and the remaining twenty percent was added to the trust corpus. Under Article Four of the trust, the trustees had the discretion to increase the son’s income beyond eighty percent as “needed in case of sickness, or desirable in view of changed circumstances,” or to stop paying income if doing so was “for his best interests.” In addition to giving the trustees broad discretion in the administration and management of the trust, Article Seven empowered the trustees “generally to do all things in relation to the Trust Fund which the Donor could do if living and this Trust had not been executed.” When the settlor died, the United States government (defendant) sought to include the principal of the trust in the settlor’s taxable estate asserting that the settlor exercised ownership control over the trust, making it subject to estate tax under 26 U.S.C. §§ 2036(a)(2) and 2038(a)(1). Relying on the decision in State Street Trust Co. v. United States, 263 F.2d 635 (1st Cir. 1959), the goverment claimed that the settlor had retained the right to “designate the persons who shall possess or enjoy the [trust] property or income” under Article Seven of the trust. The executor of the settlor’s estate (Executor) (plaintiff) paid the tax and brought an action in the district court to have it refunded. The district court denied the refund and the Executor appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Aldrich, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 171,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.