Old Stone Capital Corp. v. John Hoene Implement Corp.

647 F. Supp. 916 (1986)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Old Stone Capital Corp. v. John Hoene Implement Corp.

United States District Court for the District of Idaho
647 F. Supp. 916 (1986)

LJ

Facts

On December 10, 1979, Old Stone Capital Corporation (Old Stone) (plaintiff) and John Hoene Implement Corporation (JHIC) (defendant) entered into an agreement whereby Old Stone would loan JHIC $250,000 for operating capital expenses for commercial property that JHIC leased from Philomena Davis (defendant). The loan was secured by a leasehold deed of trust in favor of Old Stone on JHIC’s leasehold estate. On that same day, Davis and JHIC entered into a new 10-year lease agreement that would run concurrently with the term of JHIC’s loan with Old Stone. Davis also entered into a subordination agreement with Old Stone and signed an estoppel certificate. The subordination agreement did not deed or otherwise convey the property to Old Stone. Sometime later, JHIC defaulted on the loan. Old Stone took possession of the property and filed for foreclosure, asserting that it had acquired a fee interest in the property through the subordination agreement. Old Stone further contended that the subordination agreement was an inducement for the loan and was not intended to serve as security. Davis challenged the foreclosure, asserting that Old Stone had no standing to file for foreclosure because Old Stone did not have a fee interest in the property. Specifically, Davis noted that because the deed between JHIC and Old Stone was a leasehold deed of trust, the subordination agreement only subordinated her leasehold interest in the property. Davis maintained that the scope of the subordination agreement was limited to the subordination of Old Stone’s interest through the leasehold deed of trust, which was in the leasehold estate. Each party filed a partial motion for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership