Oldham v. Oldham

247 P.3d 736 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Oldham v. Oldham

New Mexico Supreme Court
247 P.3d 736 (2011)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 2004, David and Glenda Oldham (defendant), a married couple, executed a revocable trust as co-trustees. Upon the death of David or Glenda, the deceased spouse’s share of trust property would become irrevocable. At the same time that David and Glenda executed the trust, David executed a will, placing most of his property in the trust. In February 2007, David filed a petition for divorce. A few months later, David died. No final division of marital property or divorce decree had been entered. The son of David and Glenda, Dustin Oldham (plaintiff) initiated an action in probate court, arguing that a division of his parents’ marital property would revoke David’s will, leaving David’s property to pass through intestate succession. Glenda counterclaimed, seeking affirmation of the will and trust. The trial court ruled in Glenda’s favor. The court of appeals reversed. The New Mexico Supreme Court granted review to address procedural matters that arise when a party dies during a pending divorce.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Daniels, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership