Supreme Court of Wisconsin
286 N.W.2d 573 (1980)
Olfe (plaintiff) retained attorney Gordon (defendant) to negotiate the sale of certain real estate. Olfe instructed Gordon that she was willing to accept a first mortgage as consideration but would not accept a subordinate mortgage. Contrary to Olfe’s instructions, Gordon negotiated a sales contract that included a second mortgage and misrepresented the terms of the contract, such that Olfe believed she had acquired a first mortgage interest. When the purchaser ultimately defaulted on the contract, the true holder of the first mortgage foreclosed on the property, and Olfe lost more than $25,000. Olfe sued Gordon for legal malpractice, but the trial court dismissed her claims on grounds of insufficient evidence, including the lack of expert testimony as to the standard of care that Gordon should have exercised under the circumstances. Olfe appealed, and the case proceeded to review by the state supreme court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Callow, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.