Olivas-Motta v. Holder
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
716 F.3d 1199 (2013)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Manuel Olivas-Motta (plaintiff) was a lawful permanent resident of the United States who was convicted of two crimes: the facilitation of the unlawful possession of marijuana under Arizona state law, and the crime of endangerment. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), noncitizens could be deported if convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMTs).The United States began removal proceedings against Olivas-Motta on the grounds that his criminal convictions amounted to two CIMTs. At Olivas-Motta’s removal hearing, the government (defendant) placed into evidence procedural documentation about Olivas-Motta’s conduct in the endangerment case beyond the conviction record, including charging documents and police reports. The immigration judges relied on these documents to determine that the conviction for endangerment did amount to a CIMT and that Olivas-Motta was therefore removable. Olivas-Motta appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which dismissed his appeal. Olivas-Motta petitioned for court review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

