Olivas-Motta v. Holder

716 F.3d 1199 (2013)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Olivas-Motta v. Holder

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
716 F.3d 1199 (2013)

Facts

Manuel Olivas-Motta (plaintiff) was a lawful permanent resident of the United States who was convicted of two crimes: the facilitation of the unlawful possession of marijuana under Arizona state law, and the crime of endangerment. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), noncitizens could be deported if convicted of crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMTs).The United States began removal proceedings against Olivas-Motta on the grounds that his criminal convictions amounted to two CIMTs. At Olivas-Motta’s removal hearing, the government (defendant) placed into evidence procedural documentation about Olivas-Motta’s conduct in the endangerment case beyond the conviction record, including charging documents and police reports. The immigration judges relied on these documents to determine that the conviction for endangerment did amount to a CIMT and that Olivas-Motta was therefore removable. Olivas-Motta appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which dismissed his appeal. Olivas-Motta petitioned for court review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership