Oliverio v. Transdev Services, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
2017 WL 6546338 (2017)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Ralph Oliverio (plaintiff) was struck and seriously injured by a Yellow Cab taxicab in San Francisco. Oliverio sued Yellow Cab and won a judgment. However, because Yellow Cab did not carry the city-mandated minimum liability insurance, it did not pay Oliverio’s judgment, and it later filed for bankruptcy, leaving the judgment unsatisfied. Oliverio then sued Transdev Services, Inc. (Transdev) (defendant), alleging that its failure to monitor and enforce Yellow Cab’s compliance with the mandated insurance minimum constituted a breach of Transdev’s paratransit agreement with the City of San Francisco. The paratransit program was designed to provide transportation services to the city’s elderly and disabled citizens. Under the terms of the paratransit agreement, Transdev administered all aspects of the program, including subcontracting with transport-service providers (TSPs), including Yellow Cab. The agreement also obliged Transdev to monitor and enforce the TSPs’ performance, including their compliance with regulations requiring taxicab companies to maintain the mandated minimum liability-insurance coverage. The agreement also indemnified the city’s transportation agency for injuries caused by a provider engaged in providing paratransit services. Oliverio alleged that Transdev’s breach was the proximate cause of Yellow Cab’s inability to satisfy Oliverio’s personal-injury judgment, and that Oliverio was an intended third-party beneficiary of the paratransit agreement. The trial court sustained Transdev’s demurrer and dismissed Oliverio’s claims. Oliverio appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kennedy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.