Supreme Court of Illinois
686 N.E.2d 563 (1997)
Olson and others (plaintiffs) contracted to sell a John Deere dealership to Etheridge (defendant). Etheridge later sold half the dealership to Engelhaupt (defendant). Under that contract (Agreement II), Engelhaupt was to pay the plaintiffs to satisfy Etheridge’s debt under the sale contract. Engelhaupt and Etheridge then negotiated a third contract under which Engelhaupt would pay the remaining amount owed under Agreement II to Princeton Bank instead of the plaintiffs. Etheridge failed to pay the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs, as third-party beneficiaries of Agreement II, sued Etheridge and Engelhaupt. The Circuit Court of Bureau County entered summary judgment for the plaintiffs based on the rule set out in Bay v. Williams, 1 N.E. 340 (1884), that the rights of a third-party beneficiary cannot be changed or terminated without the beneficiary’s consent. The ruling was upheld on appeal. Engelhaupt appealed to the Supreme Court of Illinois.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bilandic, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.