From our private database of 12,700+ case briefs...
Olson v. Halvorsen
Delaware Court of Chancery
2009 WL 1317148
In February 1999, Brian Olsen (plaintiff), Andreas Halvorsen (defendant), and David Ott (defendant) met to discuss the formation of a hedge fund called Viking Global. At that meeting they orally agreed to the basic elements of the business, including compensation. Specifically, they agreed that the business would pay out all profits annually, and that a departing member would be entitled only to accrued compensation and the balance of his capital account – not to an equity percentage of the total value of the business. Viking Global was ultimately organized into a Delaware limited partnership and three Delaware limited liability companies (LLCs). The three founders were partners or members in all the entities. For the limited partnership and first two LLCs, the three founders signed lengthy partnership and operating agreements, respectively. These agreements all included the arrangement that on departure, a principal would receive only accrued compensation and his capital account balance. The fourth entity, Global Viking Founders, LLC (Founders) (defendant), was first proposed by Olsen in mid-1999 as a vehicle for departing founders to be paid an earnout in addition to the agreed-to compensation and capital account funds. Halvorsen and Ott left the topic open to discussion but never expressly agreed to the earnout. Olsen instructed outside counsel to draft an operating agreement for Founders including the earnout arrangement. Various drafts were sent to Halverson and Ott, but they never read or signed them. Olsen had the outside counsel file a certificate of formation for Founders, and funds were occasionally funneled through the entity at Olsen’s direction. Another Viking executive discovered Founders in 2003 and placed the topic on the agenda for management committee meetings. It was never discussed at any meeting. In August 2005, Olsen was officially dismissed from Viking. He was paid his accrued compensation and his capital account balance, but he demanded in addition that he receive an earnout as provided in the Founders operating agreement. Halvorsen and Ott refused, arguing that they had never agreed to that arrangement. Olsen sued Halverson, Ott, and all the Viking entities, seeking the additional funds.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Lamb, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 120,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 12,700 briefs, keyed to 172 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.