Olu-Cole v. E. L. Haynes Public Charter School
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
930 F.3d 519 (2019)
- Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD
Facts
MK was a student in E. L. Haynes Public Charter School (school) (defendant) and had a significant emotional disability requiring an individualized education program (IEP). MK assaulted another student, and the school determined that the behavior was a manifestation of MK’s disability. The school suspended MK for the maximum time allowed under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and put MK in an alternative school setting. The school initiated a due-process hearing to determine whether it would be appropriate to permanently transfer MK. The school asked MK’s mother, Velma Olu-Cole (plaintiff), for permission to extend MK’s interim placement during the hearing process. Olu-Cole objected, but the school refused to readmit MK. The school requested another due-process hearing regarding the permanent transfer and for approval to extend the interim suspension. MK’s suspension reached the IDEA’s cap, and Olu-Cole filed suit in federal court, seeking a preliminary injunction to compel MK’s return to school under the IDEA’s stay-put provision. The district court denied the injunction, finding that Olu-Cole did not demonstrate that MK would suffer irreparable harm without the injunction. Olu-Cole appealed to the District of Columbia Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Millett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.