Omaha Indemnity Company v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
209 Cal. App. 3d 1266, 258 Cal. Rptr. 66 (1989)
- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Landlords Frank and Margaret Greinke (the Greinkes) (plaintiffs) sued their tenants, K.R. and Patricia Trefts, (the Trefts) (defendants) for property damage allegedly caused by them from an oil spill at the Greinke’s property and Omaha Indemnity Company (Omaha) (defendant) for declaratory relief, alleging that they were third-party beneficiaries of the general liability insurance contract between the Trefts and Omaha. Omaha demurred and alleged that because the Greinkes were not parties to the insurance contract and had not alleged an interest in the policy or a denial of coverage, there was no case or controversy pending against Omaha. The trial court denied the demurrer and Omaha’s alternative request to sever the declaratory action from the negligence action. Omaha sought relief by way of extraordinary writ. The appellate court initially denied the petition for a writ of mandate, but the case returned to the appellate court after the California Supreme Court granted review and ordered the case transferred back with direction to issue an alternative writ considering California Evidence Code § 1155, which precludes the use of evidence that an alleged tortfeasor has insurance for the injury the tortfeasor allegedly caused.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Gilbert, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.