Orcilla v. Big Sur, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
244 Cal. App. 4th 982 (2016)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
In response to a mailing from a loan company, Teodora Orcilla (plaintiff) agreed to refinance the home where she lived with her husband and three minor grandchildren. Orcilla did not speak English as her first language, and the refinancing forms were all preprinted forms in English. Orcilla told the lender that the family's total monthly income was $3,000, but the lender assured her that she could afford the new loan payments. The new loan was a $525,000 adjustable-rate mortgage with payments that started at approximately $4200 per month. Orcilla eventually defaulted on the loan. Under the terms of the refinance contract, the property was sold to Big Sur, Inc. (defendant) in a trustee’s sale. Orcilla filed a lawsuit in California state court to set aside the sale, arguing that the refinance contract was not enforceable because it was unconscionable. The trial court dismissed the complaint for failing to state a valid claim as a matter of law. Orcilla appealed to the California Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Premo, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 907,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 996 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

