Orcilla v. Big Sur, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
244 Cal. App. 4th 982 (2016)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
In response to a mailing from a loan company, the Orcillas (plaintiffs) agreed to refinance their home. The Orcillas did not speak English as their first language, but the forms used in the refinancing were all preprinted forms in English. Mrs. Orcilla told the lender that the Orcillas made only $3,000 per month, but the lender assured her that they could afford the new loan payments. The new loan was a $525,000 adjustable-rate mortgage with payments that started at approximately $4200 per month. The Orcillas eventually defaulted on the loan. Under the terms of the refinance contract, the property was sold to Big Sur, Inc. in a trustee’s sale (defendant). The Orcillas moved to set aside the sale, arguing that the refinance contract was not enforceable because it was unconscionable. The case ended up before the California Court of Appeal.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Premo, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.