United States Supreme Court
456 U.S. 667 (1982)
Kennedy (defendant) was tried for stealing a rug. During redirect examination of a witness, the prosecutor asked a number of questions about why the witness filed a complaint against Kennedy, including whether Kennedy was a “crook.” After sustaining a number of the defense’s objections, the trial court granted Kennedy’s motion for a mistrial. Before the retrial, Kennedy moved the court to dismiss the charges on double jeopardy grounds. The trial court held a hearing and determined that the prosecutor did not intend to induce a mistrial, and the Double Jeopardy Clause did not prohibit retrial. Kennedy was convicted. The Oregon Court of Appeals overturned the conviction and found that the retrial was barred on double jeopardy grounds due to the prosecutor’s “overreaching.” The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)
Concurrence (Powell, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 203,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.