Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
849 F.2d 1354 (1988)


Facts

Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc. (Orkin) (defendant) provided insect-extermination services. A customer could sign up for a lifetime guarantee for termite protection for an annual fee. As long as the customer paid the annual fee each year, Orkin agreed to reinspect and retreat the building as needed. A pamphlet distributed by Orkin stated that the annual fee “never increases.” In 1980, Orkin notified customers of an increase to the annual fee on contracts signed before 1975. Many customers complained, and Orkin sent those customers a letter blaming the price increase on inflation and insisting that the price increase was contractually valid. Eventually, Orkin agreed to rescind price increases for all contracts signed in 1968, as well as those signed by customers citing sales presentations or contract terms. By 1984, Orkin had generated over $7,500,000 in additional revenue from the price increase. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (plaintiff) filed a complaint. The FTC argued that Orkin’s price increase was a unilateral breach of over 200,000 consumer contracts. The FTC argued that the widespread price increase was an unfair trade practice in violation of § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act). The administrative-law judge entered a cease and desist order requiring Orkin to rescind all price increases. Orkin appealed, arguing that a breach of contract does not come within the scope of an unfair or deceptive trade practice prohibited by the FTC Act.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.