Orloff v. Los Angeles Turf Club
CAlifornia Supreme Court
30 Cal. 2d 110, 180 P.2d 321 (1947)
![JL](https://quimbee-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/educator/photo/176/Josh_Lee.webp)
- Written by Josh Lee, JD
Facts
The Los Angeles Turf Club (LATC) (defendant), which operated a horse-racing course and gambling establishment, repeatedly ejected Morris Orloff (plaintiff) from the establishment without cause, despite his good moral character and proper conduct. This ejectment caused Orloff humiliation and mental anguish. Orloff commenced an action against LATC for injunctive relief. A California statute in the California Civil Code (Code) provided that no race course or other public amusement could refuse admittance to anyone over 21 years old who bought a ticket, unless the person was drunk, engaged in boisterous conduct, or was of “lewd or immoral character.” The statute provided that if a person was ejected in violation of law, he could seek his actual damages, plus $100. The trial court denied an injunction on the grounds that (1) the statute created a new right not existing at common law and was therefore in derogation of common law, (2) the statute must be strictly construed, and (3) any remedies provided in the statute must therefore be treated as exclusive. Orloff appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.