Orman v. Cullman

2004 Del. Ch. LEXIS 150 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Orman v. Cullman

Delaware Court of Chancery
2004 Del. Ch. LEXIS 150 (2004)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Play video

Facts

General Cigar Holdings, Inc. (General) was a public company founded by the Cullman family. Edward Cullman, Sr. and Jr. (the Cullmans) (defendants) controlled General through ownership of Class B common stock. Swedish Match AB (Swedish) and General agreed to a merger that would give Swedish 64 percent and the Cullmans 36 percent of General. The terms included: (1) Swedish would pay the Cullmans $15.25 per share for one-third of their interest; (2) General would be merged into a Swedish subsidiary; (3) public shareholders would receive $15.25 per share; (4) at Swedish’s insistence, a lock-up provision would require the Cullmans to vote their Class B shares for the merger and against any alternative proposal for 18 months if the merger terminated; and (5) a fiduciary out would permit the board to withdraw its recommendation of the merger. The voting agreement did not bind the Cullmans as officers and directors nor prohibit General’s board from considering other proposals. There were no other potential buyers. After the merger was approved, Joseph Orman (plaintiff), a Class A common stockholder, sued General’s board of directors for breach of their fiduciary duties in negotiating the merger terms.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chandler, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership