Ornelas v. United States

517 U.S. 690, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Ornelas v. United States

United States Supreme Court
517 U.S. 690, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Police arrested Miguel and Ismael Ornelas (defendants) after searching Miguel’s car without a warrant and finding two kilograms of cocaine. Ornelas filed a motion to suppress the evidence on the ground that the police lacked probable cause. After a hearing, the magistrate judge concluded that police had reasonable suspicion but not probable cause for the search. However, the magistrate recommended denying suppression because the police had a drug-sniffing dog present, which would have inevitably found the drugs anyway. The trial judge decided that police had probable cause for the search once an officer discovered the loose panel where the drugs were hidden. Therefore, the judge admitted the evidence. On appeal, the Seventh Circuit applied a clear-error standard of review that defers to the trial court’s findings as to reasonable suspicion and probable cause. Noting a split among circuit courts as to whether a clear-error or de novo standard applies, the Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rehnquist, J.)

Dissent (Scalia, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 747,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 747,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership