Orr v. Mortvedt

735 N.W.2d 610 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Orr v. Mortvedt

Supreme Court of Iowa
735 N.W.2d 610 (2007)

Facts

Randy and Colleen Sevde purchased a parcel of land, the boundaries of which ran through a portion of an abandoned quarry that had filled with water to create a man-made lake. Mortvedt (defendant) subsequently purchased a parcel that also included a portion of the quarry and lake. Orr (plaintiff) later purchased a third parcel encompassing a portion of the quarry and subdivided it into a fourth parcel which was conveyed to Cameron. Disputes arose among the four property owners regarding boundary line locations and use of the surface waters of the lake. Orr, Sevde, and Cameron filed suit seeking a determination of the property boundaries, a declaration of mineral rights, and affirmation of their right to drain the lake and fence off boundary lines. The Orr parties also sought a determination of whether the parties had the right to use the entire surface of the lake or exclusively the surface area within the boundaries of their respective properties. Finally, the Orr parties sought an injunction prohibiting Mortvedt from using any portion of the lake surface outside the boundaries of Mortvedt’s property description with damages for trespass. The trial court concluded that the parties’ use of the lake surface was limited to the area located within their property boundaries, and that the parties were entitled to drain the portions of the quarry located within their property boundaries and construct fences or berms along the property lines. Mortvedt appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Hecht, J.)

Dissent (Cady, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership