Ortega v. Yokohama Corporation of North America
Delaware Superior Court
2010 WL 1534044
- Written by Serena Lipski, JD
Facts
Nelson Flores Hernandez was killed while driving in the Mexican state of Michoacán. Hernandez was a resident of Estado de Mexico, a state within Mexico. Azucena Gomez Ortega (plaintiff), the personal representative of Hernandez’s estate and also a resident of Estado de Mexico, claimed that one of Hernandez’s tires failed. Ortega filed claims for strict liability and negligent design, testing, manufacture, and marketing against Yokohama Corporation of North America (YCNA), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in California, and Yokohama Tire Corporation (YTC), incorporated and headquartered in California (collectively Yokohama) (defendant), the tire manufacturer, in Delaware state court. Hernandez’s tire was designed and manufactured in Virginia and tested in Ohio. Yokohama filed a choice-of-law motion, arguing that the law of Michoacán or California should apply. Mexican law significantly limited damages for wrongful death and did not allow a survival cause of action.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jurden, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.