Orzech v. Fairleigh Dickinson University

985 A.2d 189 (2009)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Orzech v. Fairleigh Dickinson University

New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
985 A.2d 189 (2009)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

Twenty-one-year-old college student Keith Orzech was living in a Fairleigh Dickinson University (defendant) resident hall over the summer between semesters. He threw a party with grain alcohol, drinking games, and students under 21, which violated three of the school’s alcohol rules. As resident assistants (RAs), he and his roommate were tasked with reporting alcohol violations to the school’s public safety department, but neither did. Orzech was extremely intoxicated by 2:00 a.m., when two students helped him to bed. Sometime later, he fell from his fourth-floor bedroom window and died. His family (plaintiffs) sued the university for negligence, citing an inadequate alcohol policy and lack of enforcement. The university argued that charitable immunity precluded liability for simple negligence claims brought on behalf of its students, and that Orzech was a student receiving educational benefits from the university by living in its residence halls. A provost testified that the university provided residence halls to help students develop interpersonal skills, relationships, and responsibilities that furthered their overall education. The judge rejected a per se rule qualifying all students as educational beneficiaries, reasoning that Orzech’s violating alcohol policy meant he was not a beneficiary at the time of the accident. The jury found each side 50-percent negligent, awarding Orzech’s family $260,000. The university appealed, arguing that charitable immunity barred any liability.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lisa, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership