Osborne v. Montgomery
Wisconsin Supreme Court
234 N.W. 372 (Wis. 1931)
Lester Osborne (plaintiff), age thirteen, was employed to run errands for a newspaper. On August 30, 1928, he was returning to the newspaper on his bicycle. Montgomery (defendant) had just lawfully stopped his car on the same road on which Osborne was riding. Montgomery opened the car door to get out just as Osborne was approaching. Osborne’s bicycle hit the car door and threw him to the ground, causing injuries. Osborne sued Montgomery on the ground that Montgomery was negligent. At trial the jury was instructed that negligence is the “want of ordinary care.” The jury found that Montgomery was negligent in failing to look around before opening his car door and awarded Osborne $2,500 in damages. Montgomery appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Rosenberry, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.