Otani v. Broudy

114 Wash. App. 545, 59 P.3d 126 (2002)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Otani v. Broudy

Washington Court of Appeals
114 Wash. App. 545, 59 P.3d 126 (2002)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Dr. David Broudy (defendant) punctured Yaeko Otani’s (plaintiff) aorta during pacemaker-implantation surgery, causing uncontrollable bleeding. Otani was unconscious when the injury occurred and died several hours later without ever regaining consciousness. Otani was 81 years old, active, and social. If the pacemaker had been successfully implanted, Otani would have been expected to live an additional eight years. After Otani’s death, the personal representative of Otani’s estate (the estate) (plaintiff) brought a survival action against Broudy and sought damages for Otani’s loss of enjoyment of life (the loss-of-enjoyment damages) for the remaining eight years of her expected lifespan. The trial court granted the requested loss-of-enjoyment damages, holding that loss-of-enjoyment damages were recoverable in the estate’s survival action because, had Otani been severely injured rather than killed, Otani could have brought an action for loss-of-enjoyment damages herself. Broudy appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Becker, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership