Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Overton v. Commissioner

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
162 F.2d 155 (1947)


Facts

In 1936, an amendment was made to the certificate of incorporation for Castle & Overton, Inc. (Castle). The amendment created 1,000 shares in addition to Castle’s already existing 1,000 shares. One thousand shares were designated as Class A stock and the other 1,000 were designated as Class B stock. The original shareholders held Class A stock but transferred the Class B stock to their wives. Class B stock was restricted to having no more than a one dollar value per share. Dividends of up to $10 per share were to be paid to Class A shareholders. Any dividends in excess of $10 per share were to be shared, with Class A shareholders receiving one-fifth of the excess and Class B shareholders receiving four-fifths. From 1936–1941, dividends paid to Class B shareholders amounted to $150.40 per share and dividends paid to Class A shareholders amounted to $77.60 per share. Because Class B stock was limited to $1,000 of corporate assets, the large amount of dividends received by Class B shareholders primarily accrued from the assets represented by Class A stock. The Commissioner (defendant) determined that Overton and Oliphant (plaintiffs), who both held Class A Castle stock, were liable for the dividends received by their wives, who held Class B Castle stock. The Tax Court held that the dividends received by the wives were, for tax purposes, income to Overton and Oliphant.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Swan, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 205,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.