Owen Electric Steel Co. of South Carolina, Inc. v. Browner
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
37 F.3d 146 (1994)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Owen Electric Steel Company of South Carolina, Inc. (Owen) (plaintiff) generated slag as a byproduct of steel production. Slag was generated when Owen added crushed limestone to the molten metal in the steel-production furnace to bind and remove nonferrous constituents. The slag was skimmed off and then stored in large, bare-ground holding bays for six months to cure, which allowed the slag to stabilize. After curing, the slag was sold to the construction industry, typically for use in road construction. Owen applied for a permit as an operator of a facility that treats, stores, or disposes of hazardous wastes (TSD facility) under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). As part of issuing the permit, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classified the slag processing area, where the slag sat for its six-month long cure, as a solid-waste management unit. Owen challenged the classification, arguing the slag was not discarded material because it was recycled for use in road construction and therefore could not qualify as solid waste. The EPA countered, arguing the slag was discarded because Owen left it exposed on the bare ground for six months to cure before reselling it.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Russell, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.