Supreme Court of California
119 P.2d 713 (1941)
Owen (plaintiff) and Cohen (defendant) entered into an oral agreement to become partners in a bowling alley. Owen loaned the partnership $6,986.63 to buy the necessary equipment, which the parties agreed would be paid back to Owen from the profits of the business. While the business proved immediately profitable, the parties started quarreling over issues such as management and policies of the enterprise, and their rights and duties under their partnership agreement. Cohen insisted on being the dominant partner, and was openly hostile toward Owen in front of customers and employees. Cohen refused to do any manual work, and appropriated partnership funds for personal use. Cohen further demanded that a gambling room be added to the bowling alley, which Owen vehemently opposed. The partners’ constant arguments resulted in a steady decline of the bowling alley’s monthly receipts. Realizing that the parties could not resolve their differences, Owen offered Cohen the choice of either buying out Owen’s interest in the bowling alley, or selling Cohen’s interest to Owen. Cohen refused to reasonably entertain either option, insisting that the business be continued until he was ready to sell at a price he would set himself. Owen subsequently filed an action in equity to dissolve the partnership. The trial court found that Cohen’s behavior in relation to the business made it impossible for the partnership to continue, and decreed dissolution of the partnership. The trial court also appointed a receiver to sell the partnerships’ assets, ordering that Owen receive half the proceeds, plus $6,986.63 as payment for the loan he made to the partnership.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Curtis, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.