Owens v. Republic of Sudan
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
864 F.3d 751 (2017)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Al Qaeda killed over 200 people and injured over 1,000 in simultaneous truck bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998. James Owens and others representing the victims (plaintiffs) brought a lawsuit claiming the Republic of Sudan (defendant) provided the terrorists with material support in activities that caused the bombings in violation of international law. Sudan did not appear at or before trial. Before trial, the court held an evidentiary hearing and qualified three terrorism experts to give opinions about Sudan supporting al Qaeda. The experts said they relied on multiple sources of information as well as the evidence presented at the hearing. The court also admitted almost a decade’s worth of State Department reports that showed Sudan continued to harbor terrorist groups including Osama Bin Laden’s al Qaeda despite repeated warnings. The court concluded that Sudan provided material support to al Qaeda and entered judgment against Sudan. Sudan appealed on multiple grounds, including challenging the expert opinions as unreliable and inconsistent with underlying facts and the State Department reports as inadmissible hearsay.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ginsburg, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.