Owens v. State

724 A.2d 43 (1999)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Owens v. State

Maryland Court of Appeals
724 A.2d 43 (1999)

SR
Play video

Facts

A police officer discovered Timothy Owens (defendant), 18, and Ariel Johnson getting dressed in the rear seat of a parked car. When asked how old she was by the officer, Johnson said she was 16-years-old. However, it was later learned that Johnson was only 13-years-old. Owens was charged with second-degree rape under a state statute that made sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 14 a felony offense. At trial, Johnson admitted that she and Owens had sexual intercourse and that she had told him that she was 16-years-old. Owens filed a motion to dismiss the charge claiming there was a reasonable mistake of fact regarding Johnson’s true age that negated Owens’ guilt. The trial court denied the motion based on the holding of Garnett v. State, 632 A.2d 797 (Md.1993), which interpreted the state’s rape statute to be a strict liability offense. The trial judge noted that, under Garnett, mistake of age could only be used as a mitigating factor at the time of Owens’ sentencing. Owens was found guilty, sentenced to a term in prison as well as probation, and ordered to register as a child sex offender. Owens appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Chasanow, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership