Owusu v. Jackson

[2005] E.C.R. I-1383, Case C-281/02 (2005)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Owusu v. Jackson

European Union Court of Justice
[2005] E.C.R. I-1383, Case C-281/02 (2005)

Facts

Andrew Owusu (plaintiff), a British national domiciled in the United Kingdom (UK), rented a Jamaican villa from N.B. Jackson (defendant), who was also domiciled in the UK. The contract provided that Owusu would have private beach access. Mammee Bay Club Ltd. (Mammee), Enchanted Garden Resorts & Spa Ltd. (Enchanted), and Town & Country Resorts Ltd. (Town & Country) (defendants), were Jamaican companies that owned or operated the beach and surrounding properties. Owusu was severely injured after diving into the ocean and striking an underwater object. Owusu filed suit against Jackson, Mammee, Enchanted, and Town & Country in the UK, claiming that Jackson had breached the contract and that Mammee, Enchanted, and Town & Country had committed torts. The UK was a member of the Brussels Convention of 1968, but Jamaica was not. Jackson, Mammee, Enchanted, and Town & Country motioned the UK court to decline jurisdiction on the grounds that Jamaica was the more convenient forum. The UK court denied the motion and exercised jurisdiction conferred by the Brussels Convention of 1968. Jackson, Mammee, Enchanted, and Town & Country appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 834,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership