Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
O

Oxford House-C v. City of St. Louis

77 F.3d 249 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Oxford House-C v. City of St. Louis

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
77 F.3d 249 (1996)

  • Written by Alexander Hager-DeMyer, JD

Facts

The City of St. Louis (city) (defendant) had a zoning code defining single-family dwellings as those including three nonrelated, nondisabled residents in a home and group homes as those with eight or fewer unrelated, disabled residents. Oxford House-C (Oxford) (plaintiff) was a group home for recovering alcoholics and drug addicts located in a city neighborhood zoned for single-family dwellings. More than eight unrelated men lived at Oxford. The city cited Oxford for violating the zoning laws. Oxford filed suit against the city in federal district court, alleging, among other claims, that by enforcing the eight-person limit, the city violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA). The district court ruled in favor of Oxford and issued an injunction against the city, dismissing the city’s counterclaim. The city appealed to the Eighth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fagg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 833,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 833,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Disability Law

Key Terms