Oxygenated Fuels Association, Inc. v. Davis

331 F.3d 665 (2003)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Oxygenated Fuels Association, Inc. v. Davis

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
331 F.3d 665 (2003)

  • Written by Robert Cane, JD

Facts

State officials on the California Air Resources Board (the board) (defendants) enacted a ban on methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE). MTBE was an oxygenate used as a fuel additive to reduce gasoline emissions. The Oxygenated Fuels Association Incorporated (OFA) (plaintiff) represented MTBE producers and opposed the ban. The Clean Air Act prohibited states from regulating fuel additives based on motor-vehicle-emission control. California was exempted from this provision of the Clean Air Act and was authorized to regulate fuel additives for the purpose of emission control under 42 U.S.C. § 7545(c)(4)(B). The board stated that it had imposed the ban on MTBE to protect groundwater and did not mention emission control. OFA brought an action against various state officials, arguing that the ban on MTBE was preempted by the federal Clean Air Act. The district court granted the state officials’ motion to dismiss. OFA appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership