P.F.I., Inc. v. Kulis
New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division
363 N.J. Super. 292, 832 A.2d 931 (2003)
- Written by Tammy Boggs, JD
Facts
P.F.I., Inc. (PFI) (plaintiff) was a gasoline wholesaler that contracted with service stations to supply Texaco gasoline. In 1991, PFI entered an agreement with Nadezda Kulis (defendant), who operated a gas station and automobile-repair shop. Under the agreement, Kulis was required to purchase a minimum of two million gallons of gasoline over five or so years in similar quantities every month. In 1994, Kulis had to close the automobile-repair part of her service station, which caused a decline in gasoline sales. PFI ceased its delivery of gasoline and demanded payment of outstanding balances. PFI sued Kulis to recover amounts for unpaid invoices and PFI’s lost profits. During a bench trial, PFI did not provide evidence of its supplies and sales of gasoline to any other customer. One of PFI’s salesmen testified that he anticipated a profit of five cents per gallon on the contract with Kulis based on a rough mathematical calculation, unaccompanied by any documents to support the figures in his calculation. The trial court awarded damages for the unpaid invoices and about $30,400 for lost profits. Kulis appealed, challenging PFI’s ability to recover lost profits.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Axelrad, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.