Pace v. Ohio Department of Transportation
Ohio Court of Claims
594 N.E.2d 187 (1991)
In December 1987, Michael Pace (plaintiff) was a passenger in a vehicle that was struck by a snowplow owned and operated by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) (defendant). The crash caused an impact to the small finger of Pace’s left hand, and hospital records indicate that Pace’s finger was swollen when he was brought in after the accident. Pace returned to the emergency room a few days later, after the swelling in his finger failed to subside. An infection had spread throughout Pace’s finger, and his finger was ultimately amputated. In 1989, Pace filed a complaint against ODOT for damages resulting from the loss of his finger. The negligence of ODOT in the crash was not in dispute, but ODOT argued that its negligence was not the proximate cause of the amputation because Pace was a diabetic and had negligently contributed to his own injuries after the initial accident.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Leach, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.