Pacific Dunlop Ltd. v. Hogan

[1989] FCA 185, 23 F.C.R. 553, 87 A.L.R. 14 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pacific Dunlop Ltd. v. Hogan

Federal Court of Australia
[1989] FCA 185, 23 F.C.R. 553, 87 A.L.R. 14 (1989)

SH

Facts

Paul Hogan (plaintiff) co-wrote and performed in the title role of Mick Dundee in the successful film Crocodile Dundee. The film featured a scene in which Dundee and a female companion were walking down the street and Dundee fended off a group of muggers with a knife. Pacific Dunlop Ltd. (Pacific) (defendant) manufactured Grosby “Leatherz” shoes. Pacific launched an advertising campaign for the shoes, using both posters and a television commercial, that mirrored the famous knife scene from the film, with the shoes being the instruments used to fend off the muggers instead of a knife. Although the character in the advertisement was not Hogan himself, he wore clothing similar to what Hogan wore in the film. Hogan brought a claim of passing off against Pacific, arguing that use of the knife scene from the film in Pacific’s advertisement misrepresented a commercial association or endorsement with Hogan as Crocodile Dundee. The lower court agreed and restrained Pacific from further dissemination of the advertisement. Pacific appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beaumont, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership