Pacific Inv. Management Co. LLC v. Mayer Brown LLP
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
603 F.3d 144 (2010)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Financial services company Refco Inc. (Refco) loaned money to its clients to purchase securities. Due to market losses, many of Refco’s clients were unable to repay their loans. Refco allegedly transferred this uncollectible debt to a holding company and then created sham loan transactions with third parties in an attempt to hide the losses. Refco also issued bond offerings and an IPO. Law firm Mayer Brown LLP (Mayer Brown) (defendant) assisted Refco in its creation of an offering memorandum, the IPO, and the registration statement filed in connection with the securities offering. These documents relied on the sham transactions to hide the aforementioned losses. Mayer Brown drafted portions of these documents before their issuance, but none of the statements in the documents were attributed to Mayer Brown. Pacific Investment Management Company LLC (Pacific) brought a Rule 10b-5 suit against Mayer Brown, seeking to hold the firm liable for its role in the creation of false statements within the offering documents. The district court granted Mayer Brown’s motion to dismiss. Pacific appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cabranes, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.