Packgen v. Berry Plastics Corp.
United States District Court for the District of Maine
973 F. Supp. 2d 48 (2013)
Packgen (plaintiff) sent two purchase orders to Berry Plastics Corp. (Berry) (defendant) for materials. For both orders, Berry delivered the materials to Packgen and several days later sent Packgen an invoice. The backs of both invoices stated that the statute of limitation period for any complaint was reduced to one year. Approximately four years after receiving the materials, Packgen sued Berry. Berry moved for summary judgment, arguing that (1) the invoices were a part of the contract because they were written confirmations of its acceptance of Packgen’s offers under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 2-207 and (2) Packgen’s claims were barred by the one-year statute of limitation stated in the invoices. Packgen argued that the invoices did not become a part of the contract.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Woodcock, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.