Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Padilla v. Hanft

547 U.S. 1062 (2006)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...

Padilla v. Hanft

United States Supreme Court

547 U.S. 1062 (2006)

Facts

On May 8, 2002, Jose Padilla (defendant), a United States citizen, was detained by federal agents pursuant to a material witness warrant at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago. Padilla was transported to New York on May 22, 2002. Padilla moved to vacate the warrant. While Padilla’s motion was pending, the president issued an order to the secretary of defense designating Padilla as an enemy combatant and that Padilla should be detained by the military. Padilla was taken to the Consolidated Naval Brig in Charleston, South Carolina. Padilla filed a habeas corpus petition in the Southern District of New York challenging Padilla’s detention. The district court denied the petition, but the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed and ordered the issuance of a writ directing for the release of Padilla. The Supreme Court granted cert and ordered the dismissal of the habeas corpus petition without prejudice because the petition should have been filed in South Carolina, not New York. In July 2004, Padilla filed a subsequent habeas corpus petition in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The district court granted the petition, but the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed that judgment. Padilla again filed for a writ of certiorari. The government (plaintiff) subsequently obtained an indictment and charged Padilla with federal crimes. The president ordered that Padilla be released from military custody and transferred to the control of the attorney general. The government filed a motion for approval for Padilla’s transfer in the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court of appeals denied the motion. The Supreme Court granted cert. The government filed a brief in opposition to certiorari arguing that Padilla’s petition was moot.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning

Concurrence (Kennedy, J.)

Dissent (Ginsburg, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 28,700 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership