United States Supreme Court
559 U.S. 356 (2010)
Jose Padilla (plaintiff), a native of Honduras, had been a permanent resident of the United States for more than 40 years when he pled guilty to, and was convicted of, a marijuana offense in Kentucky. As a result, Padilla was subject to mandatory deportation under Section 237(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). In his petition for post-conviction relief to the Kentucky Supreme Court, Padilla claimed that his trial attorney was ineffective and failed to advise him of the deportation consequences for pleading guilty to the crime. Instead, Padilla said his attorney told him that he did not have to worry about immigration status since he had been in the United States for so long. The Kentucky Supreme Court rejected Padilla’s Sixth Amendment ineffectiveness of assistance of counsel claim on the ground that the advice he sought from his attorney about the risk of deportation concerned only collateral matters and did not directly relate to the crime he had been charged with. Padilla appealed. The U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Concurrence (Alito, J.)
Dissent (Scalia, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 240,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.