Pagarigan v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
2005 WL 2742807 (2005)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Aetna U.S. Healthcare of California, Inc. (defendant) owned a health maintenance organization (“HMO”). Aetna’s HMO contracted with a management services company, Greater Valley Management Services Organization, which contracted with Greater Valley Medical Group and Greater Valley Physicians Association, which contracted with Magnolia Gardens nursing home and Dr. Buttleman to provide health care services to members of Aetna’s HMO (Aetna). Johnnie Pagarigan (plaintiff) was an elderly Medicare beneficiary and a member of Aetna’s HMO when she suffered a debilitating stroke and was assigned to Magnolia Gardens. Dr. Buttleman was responsible for Pagarigan’s care while at Magnolia Gardens and failed to timely treat an infection, a pressure sore, and several other serious medical conditions. Pagarigan was also malnourished and dehydrated. Buttleman eventually sent Pagarigan to an acute care hospital for treatment, but there was nothing the hospital could do and she died shortly thereafter. Pagarigan’s children brought suit on her behalf against Aetna’s HMO and the parent corporation. The trial court ruled that Aetna did not owe Pagarigan any duty of care and dismissed the Pagarigans’ suit. They appealed the court’s decision.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wiley, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 796,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.