From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
Page v. Page
Supreme Court of California
359 P.2d 41 (1961)
Facts
Page P. (plaintiff ) and Page D. (defendant) entered into an oral partnership agreement to run a linen supply business. Page P. and Page D. did not discuss a specific term for the partnership, but agreed that the partnership should stay in existence long enough to make a profit and pay its debts. The partners did not stipulate how long the partnership would last if it incurred financial losses. The partnership was unprofitable for eight years, but it made a profit in the following two years. In spite of the partnership’s profitability, Page P. sought to dissolve it. The trial court found that the parties’ intention was that their partnership should last only until it was profitable enough to pay all debts and operational expenses. Hence, the trial court ruled in favor of Page D., holding that the partnership had a specific term and was not a partnership-at-will.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Traynor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.