Pages v. Dominguez
Florida District Court of Appeal
652 So. 2d 864 (1995)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Jonathan Dominguez (plaintiff) and his brother were passengers in a vehicle that was struck by Umberto Pages’s (defendant) vehicle. Jonathan suffered permanent brain damage, and his brother was killed. Dominguez, through his father, brought two actions against Pages: (1) a personal-injury action in his own right; and (2) a wrongful-death action for his brother. Dominguez’s actions were assigned to two different judges. Pages moved to consolidate the personal-injury action and the wrongful-death action. The trial court denied Pages’s motion to consolidate. Pages filed a writ of certiorari with the appellate court, arguing that (1) the trial court’s refusal to consolidate constituted an error; (2) allowing the two cases to proceed separately risked inconsistent verdicts; and (3) consolidation promoted judicial economy by avoiding duplicative discovery.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Pariente, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.