From our private database of 28,700+ case briefs...
Paige v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
580 F.2d 960 (1978)
Raymond and Patricia Paige (plaintiffs) acquired stock in a small business called Tackmer in exchange for their rights in an exclusive license agreement. Other Tackmer shareholders, in contrast, acquired their stock by paying cash. Tackmer’s articles of incorporation provided that no distinction would be made between different shares of its stock—a policy explicitly permitted by California law. However, California law also empowered the state department of corporations to impose conditions on corporate entities. Among these conditions were rules that differentiated between shareholders who acquired their shares with cash from shareholders who acquired their shares through some form of noncash property. The cash shareholders were given superior rights in terms of distribution of assets and dividends as well as the ability to control the votes of the noncash shareholders. The Paiges, who had signed an agreement that bound them to the conditions of the state department of corporations, attempted to claim their pro rata share of Tackmer’s profits and losses pursuant to Subchapter S of Chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue (the commissioner) disallowed these claims and assessed additional taxes. The Paiges paid the taxes and brought suit for a refund in federal district court. The court entered judgment for the United States government (defendant). The Paiges appealed. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Skopil, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 546,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 546,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 28,700 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.