Palermo v. LifeLink Foundation Inc.
Mississippi Court of Appeals
152 So.3d 1177 (2014)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Richard Palermo (plaintiff) had surgery to repair a ligament in his knee using a grafted human tendon supplied by LifeLink Foundation, Inc. (defendant). His knee showed signs of infection, and his surgeon opened it back up and removed the graft. Tests on the grafted tissue showed no bacteria before or after surgery. Palermo sued, asserting claims against LifeLink for strict products liability and negligence under Mississippi law. LifeLink moved for summary judgment, and its expert testified that LifeLink followed FDA and other applicable regulations and guidelines for testing, packaging, and shipping human tissue when it handled the graft, such as keeping it below freezing temperatures and shipping it out quickly. Palermo presented no competent evidence showing otherwise. Instead, Palermo’s expert said that LifeLink was a good company that complied with FDA regulations. The trial court granted summary judgment for LifeLink, reasoning that Mississippi’s “blood shield” law prohibited the strict-liability claims, and that Palermo could not show duty or breach to support his negligence claims.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fair, J)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.