Pallares v. Seinar

756 S.E.2d 128 (2014)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pallares v. Seinar

South Carolina Supreme Court
756 S.E.2d 128 (2014)

Facts

Ursula Pallares (plaintiff) lived in the Shandon/Rosewood area of Columbia, South Carolina, near Sharon Seinar and Lisa Maseng (the neighbors) (defendants). Pallares alleged that the neighbors weaponized the legal system in order to drive her from her home. Specifically, she claimed they filed baseless code-violation complaints, instigated groundless criminal charges, petitioned for her involuntary mental commitment without legal authority, and sought restraining orders against her. Pallares filed suit against the neighbors, asserting, among other claims, malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Pallares submitted an affidavit from another neighbor who stated that she heard the neighbors make derogatory remarks about Pallares’s ethnicity and express a desire to have her removed from the neighborhood. The neighbors moved for summary judgment on these claims. The trial court granted the motion, finding that there was probable cause supporting one or more of the neighbors’ complaints. Pallares appealed. The South Carolina Supreme Court granted review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Beatty, J.)

Concurrence (Kittredge, J.)

Concurrence/Dissent (Toal, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership