From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...
Palmtag v. Gartner Construction Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
513 N.W.2d 495 (1994)
Janet Palmtag (plaintiff) and her husband, John Palmtag, purchased a home and hired Gartner Construction Co. (defendant) to remodel it. The Palmtags and Gartner had an oral agreement in which the Palmtags would pay Gartner for time and materials. The Palmtags did not live in the home during the renovations. Instead, they gave the keys to Gartner, and the Palmtags regularly visited the home to monitor the progress. The house was usually left open, and the Gartner employees never attempted to limit or restrict where the Palmtags could go within the house. As part of the renovations, Gartner removed a spiral staircase leading to the basement. David Njus, a Gartner employee, removed the staircase, leaving the floor in the immediate area unsupported; placed a plywood board over the opening; and put up a wire barricade that did not contain any warnings or prevent someone from walking on the board. The Palmtags visited the home shortly after the staircase was removed. Janet walked on the plywood board near the wire barricade, and she fell through and hit the basement floor. Janet was eight months pregnant at the time and sustained serious injuries, although her baby was born at full term. The Palmtags sued Gartner. At trial, an expert for the Palmtags testified that Njus’s removal of the staircase was negligently performed and the wire barricade did not meet industry standards. The trial court determined that the Palmtags were invitees as a matter of law, and the jury found in favor of the Palmtags. Gartner appealed, arguing that the Palmtags were licensees.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Caporale, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.