Panama Railroad Co. v. Rock

266 U.S. 209 (1924)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Panama Railroad Co. v. Rock

United States Supreme Court
266 U.S. 209 (1924)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

James Rock (plaintiff) brought an action in the Canal Zone district court to recover damages for the death of his wife, who had been a passenger on a train operated by Panama Railroad Company (Panama) (defendant). Rock alleged that his wife’s death was the result of Panama’s negligence. Article 2341 of the Civil Code of Panama provided that anyone guilty of an offense or fault that damaged another was obliged to repair it without prejudice to the principal penalty imposed for the offense or fault. Article 2341 became operative in the Canal Zone by the Executive Order of May 9, 1904, which provided that the laws with which the inhabitants were familiar would continue in force in the Canal Zone. The executive order was ratified by Congress in 1912. The jury returned a verdict for Rock. The court of appeals affirmed. On appeal, Panama argued that Rock did not have a right of action under the law of the Canal Zone.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sutherland, J.)

Dissent (Holmes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership