Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Panco v. Rogers

19 N.J. Super. 12 (1952)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 33,800+ case briefs...

Panco v. Rogers

New Jersey Superior Court, Chancery Division

19 N.J. Super. 12 (1952)

Facts

John Panco (plaintiff) owned the property in question for nearly 40 years. John was a carpenter and built the home located on the property. In 1951, John decided to sell the home and move to Florida. John advertised the property for sale for $12,500 and showed the property and home to several prospective buyers. None of those prospective buyers were willing to pay $12,500 for the property. Rogers (defendant) lived in the neighborhood and came by to tour the home. Mary Panco (plaintiff), John’s wife, conducted the tour. Rogers believed that Mary reported the asking price as $5,500, but Mary spoke with an accent. Mary believed she stated the price was $12,500. Rogers returned with his wife and looked at the property again with John, but the price was not discussed during this visit. Rogers indicated he wanted to buy the property, and Rogers and John met with an attorney to sign the appropriate paperwork. Price was not verbally discussed during that meeting. John and Mary signed the sales agreement and later in the day discovered that the price was listed as $5,500 rather than $12,500. The Pancos immediately contacted Rogers, but Rogers did not cancel the agreement. The Pancos then sued, seeking rescission of the contract, and Rogers countersued, seeking specific performance of the agreement.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Haneman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 604,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,800 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 604,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 33,800 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership