Panidar Investment, Development, and Building Co. v. Castro

Rehearing 7/81, 37(4) PD 673 (1983)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Panidar Investment, Development, and Building Co. v. Castro

Israel Supreme Court
Rehearing 7/81, 37(4) PD 673 (1983)

Facts

Castro (plaintiff) and Panidar Investment, Development, and Building Co. (the Panidar company) (defendant) entered into a contract under which the Panidar company agreed to build and sell an apartment to Castro. Joseph Panidar (defendant), an owner of the Panidar company, negotiated the contract on behalf of his company but was not a party to the final contract. Castro gave the Panidar company a large sum of money pursuant to the contract. However, the Panidar company did not actually own the property on which the apartment was to be constructed. Castro sued the Panidar company and Joseph for damages based on Joseph’s failure to conduct the negotiations in good faith. The lower court issued a judgment holding Joseph personally liable to Castro, and the Israel Supreme Court affirmed. Joseph petitioned the Supreme Court for a rehearing on the issue of whether Joseph—who was not a party to the contract—could be held liable for failure to conduct negotiations in good faith. The Supreme Court granted the request for a rehearing to consider this particular issue.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shamgar, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership