Panidar Investment, Development, and Building Co. v. Castro
Israel Supreme Court
Rehearing 7/81, 37(4) PD 673 (1983)

- Written by Whitney Waldenberg, JD
Facts
Castro (plaintiff) and Panidar Investment, Development, and Building Co. (the Panidar company) (defendant) entered into a contract under which the Panidar company agreed to build and sell an apartment to Castro. Joseph Panidar (defendant), an owner of the Panidar company, negotiated the contract on behalf of his company but was not a party to the final contract. Castro gave the Panidar company a large sum of money pursuant to the contract. However, the Panidar company did not actually own the property on which the apartment was to be constructed. Castro sued the Panidar company and Joseph for damages based on Joseph’s failure to conduct the negotiations in good faith. The lower court issued a judgment holding Joseph personally liable to Castro, and the Israel Supreme Court affirmed. Joseph petitioned the Supreme Court for a rehearing on the issue of whether Joseph—who was not a party to the contract—could be held liable for failure to conduct negotiations in good faith. The Supreme Court granted the request for a rehearing to consider this particular issue.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Shamgar, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.