Papish v. Board of Curators

410 U.S. 667 (1973)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Papish v. Board of Curators

United States Supreme Court
410 U.S. 667 (1973)

Facts

Barbara Papish (plaintiff) was a journalism graduate student at the University of Missouri. The University’s Board of Curators (defendant) had a bylaw that required university students to observe accepted standards of conduct, including refraining from engaging in indecent conduct or speech. Papish was expelled after a student-conduct committee found that Papish had violated the bylaw by distributing on campus a newspaper that contained indecent speech. Specifically, the newspaper (1) featured a political cartoon of policemen raping the Statue of Liberty and the Goddess of Justice with the caption “. . . With Liberty and Justice for All” and (2) contained an article that used the word “motherfucker” in the article’s title and text. Papish challenged her expulsion in federal district court, claiming that her activities were protected by the First Amendment. The district court and appellate court denied relief, and the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

Dissent (Rehnquist, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership