Pappas v. Tzolis

87 A.D.3d 899 (2011)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Pappas v. Tzolis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
87 A.D.3d 899 (2011)

Play video

Facts

Steve Tzolis (defendant), Steve Pappas, and Constantine Ifantopoulos (plaintiffs) formed Vrahos LLC (Vrahos) (defendant), a limited liability company (LLC), under Delaware law. The company was formed for the single purpose of leasing a Manhattan building. Tzolis paid the security deposit in exchange for the right to sublease the building, provided he paid additional rent to Vrahos. Vrahos’s operating agreement, which was governed by New York law, provided that the members were free to engage in any outside business, even competing business, and owed no obligation to the company or other members. Tzolis subleased the building but made no rent payments. A few months later, Tzolis negotiated to purchase Pappas’s interest for $1 million and Ifantopoulos’s interest for $500,000. As part of the buyout, the plaintiffs signed a handwritten “certificate” stating that they had done due diligence, secured legal counsel, and not relied on Tzolis’s representations. The certificate also provided that Tzolis owed no fiduciary duties related to the transaction. Seven months later, Tzolis leased the building to Charlton Soho LLC (Charlton) for $17.5 million. The plaintiffs sued for breach of fiduciary duty and misappropriation of a business opportunity when they learned that Tzolis began negotiating the deal with Charlton before buying them out. The motion court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the operating agreement eliminated Tzolis’s fiduciary duties, pursuant to either Delaware or New York law. The plaintiffs appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mazzarelli, J.)

Dissent (Freedman, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership