Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. State

30 N.Y.2d 415 (1972)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. State

New York Court of Appeals
30 N.Y.2d 415 (1972)

JL

Facts

Paramount Film Distributing Corporation (plaintiff) paid approximately $128,000 to the State of New York (defendant) in movie-license fees from 1959 to 1965. However, the New York Court of Appeals declared the statute imposing the fees to be unconstitutional under the First Amendment because the statute did not provide for prompt judicial review of licensing decisions. For almost all of that time, Paramount had not protested any of those payments. For the last two months of that period, Paramount did pay the fees under protest. Paramount filed suit seeking restitution, or a refund, of those fees. The appellate division ruled that Paramount was entitled to full restitution. The state appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Breitel, J.)

Dissent (Bergan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership