Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Park 100 Investors, Inc. v. Kartes

Indiana Court of Appeals
650 N.E.2d 347 (1995)


Facts

The Kartes (defendants) were part owners of Kartes Video Communications, Inc. (KVC). KVC entered into an agreement to lease space at Park 100, an industrial complex. The lease negotiations were handled by Scannell, a Park 100 representative, and Kaplan, a KVC senior vice president. A personal guaranty of the lease was never discussed during negotiations. KVC entered into the lease and planned to move in July 28-29. On July 27, Scannell went to KVC offices at 5:00 p.m. and found the Kartes getting into their car. Scannell told them he had “lease papers” that they needed to sign. Kartes stated that they were leaving for their daughter’s wedding, but Scannell insisted that KVC could not move in until the papers were signed. Scannell presented a document titled “Lease Agreement” to the Kartes for them to sign. Mr. Kartes called Kaplan to confirm that KVC’s lawyer had approved the papers. The Kartes signed the papers. Scannell never informed the Kartes that they were signing a personal guaranty of lease. Years later, when Park 100 sent the Kartes a “Tenant Agreement,” the Kartes discovered the personal guaranty. The Kartes objected to the personal guaranty and refused to affirm that portion of the lease. The Kartes later sold their interest in KVC to another party. That party missed lease payments. Park 100 filed suit against the Kartes based upon the personal guaranty. The trial court held in favor of the Kartes. Park 100 appealed to the Indiana Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Barteau, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 222,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.